Pages

Sunday, April 30, 2023

EMOR, LEVITICUS 21:1–24:23, PESACH SHENI

 

EMOR, LEVITICUS 21:1–24:23, PESACH SHENI

 

 


The parsha for this week is EMOR.  In the parsha among other things, there are stated laws that pertain to the Kohanim, and also the festivals of Jewish calendar, including the counting of the Omer. The mitzvah of Kiddush Hashem is also stated. 

 

---------------------------------------------------------------

 


In Parshat Emor we learn about what was once the exalted character of the Kohanim and their responsibility to the nation of Israel.  They were our teachers.  

Who are our teachers today? 

They are you and I.

In our prayer service today, immediately before the Kohanim bless the congregation, they recite the following blessing:

ברוך אתה הי אלוחינו מלך העולם אשר קדשנו בקדןשתו של אהרון וצונו

לברך את עמו ישראל בהאבה


"Blessed are you Hashem our God, King of the universe who has sanctified us with the holiness of Ahron and commanded us to bless the people of Israel with love".

 


In the Ethics of the Fathers, 1:12, Hillel says:


הוי מתלמידיו של אהרן, אוהב שלום ורודף שלום, אוהב את הבריות ומקרבן לתורה

"Be a disciple of Aaron, loving peace and pursuing peace, loving mankind and drawing them closer to the Torah”.

--------------------------------------------------------
At 22:32 we learn:

 וְלֹא תְחַלְּלוּ, אֶת-שֵׁם קָדְשִׁי, וְנִקְדַּשְׁתִּי, בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל:  אֲנִי יְהוָה, מְקַדִּשְׁכֶם.

"And you shall not profane My holy name; but I shall be sanctified among the children of Israel: I am the LORD who sanctifies you".

 

Jews burned alive for the alleged host desecration in Deggendorf, Bavaria, in 1338, and in Sternberg, Mecklenburg, in 1492; a woodcut from the Nuremberg Chronicle (1493)

This verse is called "Kiddush Hashem, sanctification of the Name". it refers to private and communal conduct that reflects well on us, the Jewish people.

Kiddush Hashem also has an aspect of martyrdom or public self-sacrifice.  This is in accordance with Jewish practice and identity where there is the possibility of being killed for no other reason than being Jewish. There are specific conditions such as forced conversion that deal with self-sacrifice, be it willing or unwilling.

In Hebrew a martyr is known as a kaddosh which means "holy one", and martyrs are known as kedoshim meaning. The six million Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust are known as the Kedoshim.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 


 

In Parshat Emor we learn again about the eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth Law of Retaliation that has come down to mean monetary compensation for inflicting personal injury. There is one major exception: if you murder someone, you are put to death. There is no monetary compensation for taking someone's life. You cannot buy your way out.

 

At 24:19-20 we are taught what amounts to עַ֚יִן תַּ֣חַת עַ֔יִן שֵׁ֖ן תַּ֣חַת”, "An eye for an eye".

19 - "And a man who inflicts an injury upon his fellow man just as he did, so shall be done to him 
20 - fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. Just as he inflicted an injury upon a person, so shall it be inflicted upon him."

This is a principle that is sometimes referred to as reciprocal justice or measure for measure or in Latin, lex talionis, the law of retaliation or possibly equitable retribution. On its face this principle seems pretty straight forward: A person who has injured another person is to be penalized to a similar degree by the injured party.

I think the original intention of “An eye for an eye” may have been two-fold:

·        To prevent excessive punishment at the hands of either an avenging private party or his Family or Clan or Tribe. It served to prevent feuds and vendettas.

·        To ensure that the standard of care for a wealthy perpetrator, who may wish to buy his way out, be the same as for an improvised person.

 

At the time when we received the Torah at Mt. Sinai there was a Babylonian legal code present in Mesopotamia called the Code of Hammurabi.  Included in this code was the principle of “An eye for an eye”. What the law would have been in Egypt I do not know. I do know that 500 years later at the time of the Judges, as shown in 1:5-7 and Chapter 30 the law of retaliation was still in force.

Looking at the Book of Numbers, Chapter 35: 31-32 except for the crime of murder it may have been possible for a monetary payment, כֹפֶר to be acceptable in place of bodily punishment. Sometime later, it is hard to say when, the lex talionis was "humanized" by the Rabbis who interpreted "an eye for an eye" to mean reasonable monetary compensation.  The Rabbis of the Talmud interpreted it that way. And it is so today.

Question: Is this dangerous ground?  Is the reinterpretation of lex talionis an example of the ability of Judaism to adapt to changing social and intellectual ideas

--------------------------------------------------------------



COUNTING THE OMER

Leviticus 23: 10, 15

Speak to the children of Israel and say to them: When you come to the Land which I am giving you, and you reap its harvest, you shall bring to the kohen an omer of the beginning of your reaping.

And you shall count for yourselves, from the morrow of the rest day from the day you bring the omer as a wave offering seven weeks; they shall be complete.

Counting of the Omer סְפִירַת הָעוֹמֶר, Sefirat HaOmer, is a ritual in Judaism. It consists of a verbal counting of each of the 49 days between the holidays of Passover and Shavuot.

Counting the Omer is also a spiritual journey. We embark on a 50-day trek from Passover, the beginning of freedom onward to Mt. Sinai where the Hashem will be revealed and the Torah will be given and we celebrate Shavous, the Festival of Weeks.

The mystics envision each week to comprise an individual attribute of Hashem. We endeavor each day to improve our being in order to prepare for Mt. Sinai.

Another aspect of the Omer is that it is a time of mourning.

Those of us who are loyal to tradition are now in a period of mourning. It’s a time of mourning. No weddings or parties; no public entertainment, opera, concerts, theater, or cinema.

There is a legal code called Shulchan Aruch (R. Yosef Caro, 1563) which says that “We have the custom not to get married from Pesach until the 33rd day of the Omer because of what befell the pupils of Rabbi Akiva.” It then adds that one also does not get one’s hair cut until the thirty-third day.

The Talmudic basis for this is found in Tractate Yevamot 62b which says that twelve thousand pairs of Rabbi Akiva’s pupils died during this period because they did not treat each other with respect.


Jewish Warrior

A better explanation is that many of the 24,000 of Akiva’s students were soldiers and perished in the Bar Kokhba revolt.  The Talmud often wishes not to give the impression that Jews are rebellious people capable of violence.  This is what happens when you do not have your own land and are living in the Diaspora.

--------------------------------------------------------

 PESACH SHENI



On the evening of May 4, we observe Passover Sheni, the 2nd Passover.

The Biblical origin for this observance is found in the Book of Numbers 9:6-12  –

6. There were men who were ritually unclean [because of contact with] a dead person, and therefore could not make the Passover sacrifice on that day. So they approached Moses and Aaron on that day.

7, Those men said to him, "We are ritually unclean [because of contact] with a dead person; [but] why should we be excluded so as not to bring the offering of the Lord in its appointed time, with all the children of Israel?

8. Moses said to them, "Wait, and I will hear what the Lord instructs concerning you."

9. The Lord spoke to Moses saying:

10. Speak to the children of Israel saying, Any person who becomes unclean from [contact with] the dead, or is on a distant journey, whether among you or in future generations, he shall make a Passover sacrifice for the Lord.

11. In the second month, on the fourteenth day, in the afternoon, they shall make it; they shall eat it with unleavened cakes and bitter herbs.

12. They shall not leave over anything from it until the next morning, and they shall not break any of its bones. They shall make it in accordance with all the statutes connected with the Passover sacrifice.

Pesach Sheni is in modern parlance what we would call a do-over.

A do-over is a new attempt or opportunity to do something after a previous attempt has been unsuccessful or unsatisfactory.

As a child growing up in Brooklyn, do-overs were very popular when playing street games and you wanted a second bite at the apple. In some religious circles Pesach Sheni has come to mean a chance to Teshuvah, repentance.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

The Haftarah portion for Parshat Emor is from Ezekiel 44:15-31.

It concerns the Kohanim Priesthood when the 3rd Temple is established. According to Ezekiel only Priests from the line of Zadok will be legitimate.

There is a verse at 44:22 that is problematic:

And neither a widow nor a divorced woman may they take for wives, but they shall take virgins from the descendants of the House of Israel; also the widow who is only a widow, some of the priests may marry.

Compare to Leviticus 21:14 which refers to the Kohen Gadol, and only he is restricted.

A widow, a divorcee, a woman who is desecrated or a prostitute he shall not marry [any] of these. Only a virgin of his people may he take as a wife.


Saturday, April 15, 2023

TAZRIA - METZORAH, Leviticus 12:1-15:33 Yom HaShoah, Rosh Chodesh Iyar,

 


 TAZRIA - METZORAH, Leviticus 12:1-15:33

Yom HaShoah, Rosh Chodesh Iyar,

This week we have a double Torah Portion: Tazria and Metzora.  In addition we are observing Yom HaShoah and celebrating the arrival of the month of Iyar, .  And let's not forget the counting of the Omer, It is a busy week.

------------------------

Parshat Tazria begins by setting out the rules which govern a woman upon giving birth. In order to regain a status of ritual purity. She must undergo a time-related sanctification process. This process varies in length depending on whether she has given birth to a boy or a girl. It is 41 days for a male child and 81 days for a baby girl.

This raises a question: Why is additional time required when a mother has given birth to a girl?

The beginning of the ritual purification is set out at 12:2 (in part) -

אִשָּׁה כִּי תַזְרִיעַ, וְיָלְדָה זָכָר--וְטָמְאָה שִׁבְעַת יָמִים

"If a woman be delivered, and bear a man-child, then she shall be unclean seven days".

And continues at 12:5 -

וְאִם-נְקֵבָה תֵלֵד, וְטָמְאָה שְׁבֻעַיִם כְּנִדָּתָהּ; וְשִׁשִּׁים יוֹם וְשֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים, תֵּשֵׁב עַל-דְּמֵי טָהֳרָה

"And if she gives birth to a female, she shall be unclean for two weeks, like her menstruation. And for sixty six days, she shall remain in the blood of purity".



I think the reason for the additional time goes like this: 

During the period of gestation there is a presumption that the mother knows or thinks she knows that she is carrying a girl. At that point the mother realizes that it is incumbent upon her to pass on the superior wisdom and understanding, spirituality, sensitivity and teaching skills inherent in a woman to her unborn daughter.

She does this having in mind that one day the unborn daughter will have children of her own and likewise have the responsibility to educate them. Passing on this bounty to her unborn daughter depletes the mother of her natural gifts, and she needs more time to spiritually recover and resume her maternal responsibilities.

What do you think?

-------------------------------------------

 

 

 The four lepers bring the news to the guards at the gate of Samaria  from Petrus Comestor's 1372 Bible Historiale)

Tazaria,  תַזְרִיעַ  means sow a seed or inseminated.  מְּצֹרָע  means "one who is diseased", literally “a leper”. .

The Parshah Tazaria and Metzora concern a person punished with a spiritual disorder called צָּרַעַת, tzara'at.  It manifests itself on a person’s skin, something akin to psoriasis.  A Kohen is called upon to diagnose the disease.  

The only treatment offered for a person with tzara’at is quarantine for a period of time outside of the camp and shaving of the body.  After a period of time, if the treatment is effective as determined by the Kohen, the person undergoes a purification process.  Firstly the person immerses in a Mikveh, a sort of spiritual repair and cleansing.  The person must wait until the end of the day, for nightfall, and the beginning of a new day before entering back into the camp.  He is now permitted to partake in, to eat sacred food, the Korban, a part of the holy offering.  By consuming some of the Korban, the person has been fully restored to spiritual health

 

Tzara'at may also affect one’s clothing and even one’s home.  We don't have this type of disease currently and we do not understand how all the details are relevant to our practical lives.  But we do know that there are times when our spiritual being has been diseased and requires repair and purification.

 

The Tazria-Metzora and one of the haftarah for Metzora when read alone deal with people stricken with skin disease.  In Parashah Tazria at 13:46 provides that the person with skin disease "shall dwell alone; without the camp shall his dwelling be,".  

 

It is not difficult to connect the Torah readings with the situation that we still have been facing today with the Covid 19 virus.  I’ll leave it to you to make your own conclusions.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

With a little work you can connect Tazria-Metzora to Psalm 91:

In Psalm 91, verses 3 and 6 there are references to pestilence or to plague and to lesions, all of which are mentioned in this week’s double parsha Tazria-Metzora, and which unfortunately in terms of Covid-19 the entire world is coping with today.

כִּי הוּא יַצִּילְךָ, מִפַּח יָקוּשׁ;    מִדֶּבֶר הַוּוֹת
3 For He will save you from the snare that traps from the devastating pestilence.

 מִדֶּבֶר, בָּאֹפֶל יַהֲלֹךְ;  מִקֶּטֶב, יָשׁוּד צָהֳרָיִם
6 Pestilence that prowls in darkness, destruction that ravages at noon
דֶּבֶר = pestilence or plague

 לֹא-תְאֻנֶּה אֵלֶיךָ רָעָה;  וְנֶגַע, לֹא-יִקְרַב בְּאָהֳלֶךָ
10 No harm will befall you, nor will a lesion draw near to your tent.

נֶגַע = lesion, leprosy or plague
---------------------------------------------------------
As an aside, I have a personal connection to Psalm 91.  Years ago, working as a geological consultant, I was engaged in doing some field work.  It was one of those beautiful late autumn days in a West Virginia forest.  The morning air was crisp and cool. 

As I walked, I heard a buzzing sound that I took for the last chirps of some sought of insect. As I stepped forward over what appeared to be a fallen log, the buzzing noise stopped, and I paused.  My field partner yelled at me: “Mike, Run!!”  And I did.  When I looked back, the fallen log, at least four feet long and thick as your leg, was moving and disappearing down a hole.  It was a huge diamond back rattler and I had walked over it.  I think one of the lessons for this Jew was to be a little more “observant”.

 עַל-שַׁחַל וָפֶתֶן, תִּדְרֹךְ;    תִּרְמֹס כְּפִיר וְתַנִּין.
13 On a lion and a viper you will tread; you will trample a young lion and a serpent.
14 For he yearns for Me, and I shall rescue him; I shall fortify him because he knows My name.





And just in case I needed a little more persuasion, the point was brought home a few months later. Doing some more fieldwork I had reason to climb up to the top of a very steep and tall ridge. The climb was difficult for me and when I reached the top, I rested and looked around in order to catch my breath and get my bearings.

It had snowed earlier in the morning and there in front of me on a patch of newly fallen snow was the largest paw prints that I had ever seen. And there just ahead of me along the ridge line was a cave which I guessed housed the creature that made those prints. I didn’t hang around to ask its name or check whether it was an old or young lion, but when I had a chance to gather my wits I thought back to Psalm 91, Verse 13 and 14 regarding lions and such, and the prerequisites for obtaining Divine Protection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

YOM HASHOAH


Yom HaShoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day in Israel begins at sundown at the 17th of April, the 27th of Nissan.  Nationwide the Israeli flag is lowered to half-mast; the President and the Prime Minister will deliver speeches, Holocaust survivors light six torches symbolizing the approximately six million Jews murdered in the Holocaust and the Chief Rabbis will recite prayers. Restaurants, shops and public entertainment venues are closed by law. Israeli television airs Holocaust documentaries and Holocaust-related talk shows, and low-key songs are played on the radio.

At 10:00 in the morning an air raid siren sounds throughout the country and Israelis are observe two minutes of solemn reflection. Almost everyone stops what they are doing, including motorists who stop their cars in the middle of the road, standing beside their vehicles in silence as the siren is sounded.

In our home we will light a Memorial Candle.





Sunday, April 9, 2023

SHEMINI, LEVITICUS 9:1–11:47

  SHEMINI, LEVITICUS 9:1–11:47

In Parshat Shemini, Aaron’s two oldest sons, Nadav and Abihu, die at the hand of heaven when they bring “strange fire” before HaShem (Leviticus 10:1-2). 


THE KILLING OF NADAV AND ABIHU

WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE?

 The Sages and commentators offer many reasons for their death.  For example: their behavior was inappropriate because they were drunk or they did not seek permission from Moses or that they were in the Holy of Holies, and only the Kohen Gadol was authorized to enter the Holy of Holies.

I think however that the responsibility for their death lies in part with their father or perhaps with their uncle Moses, himself.  It all begins in the previous year, eight months before, in the month of Tammuz with the Sin of the Golden Calf:  Moses is away on Mt. Sinai, learning Torah from HaShem, and Aaron is in charge.  The Israelites become restive; Aaron calms them down; he makes a golden calf and proclaims the next day as a festival day (Exodus 32:1-6). 

Then early the next day, a festival day, the people bring Olah and Shlamim offerings to an altar that Aaron has erected. The Olah is the standard voluntary offering where the entire animal, except for its skin goes up to HaShem. It is a form of a gift, a thank you and by doing so, the offeror comes closer to HaShem.  The Shlamim is also voluntary, and also has a thank you connotation, but in this instance it is shared between HaShem, the priesthood and the offeror.  In both of these offerings there is a prescribed ritual  which Aaron’s sons are required to carry out which means that although Aaron may have made the golden calf, his sons assisted the populace in giving thanks to it.

HaShem becomes incensed; he vows to annihilate the entire population except for Moses, but Moses pleads on behalf of the people and calms HaShem down.  However, in the aftermath, the Sons of Levi by name, and not Aaron and his sons by name, slay three thousand of the evil-doers.  Additionally as a punishment, HaShem brings a plague against the Israelites. But in no instance does it appear that Aaron and his sons are held accountable, at least not at this juncture.

Fast forward one year later to the 1st of Nissan, the Mishkan has been completed and ready to be activated as a resting place for HaShem.  Aaron and his sons, including Nadav and Abihu the eldest of them, have been personally trained by Moses as to how to carry out their duties.  Nadav and Abihu are consumed by a heavenly fire. And the question is…Who is responsible for their deaths?

WERE THE BROTHERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN DEATHS?

The Sages and commentators place the responsibility on the two brothers themselves.  Support for this position can be found in the narrative of the death of Uzziah (2Samuel 6:3-7).  At King David’s direction, Uzziah was helping to transport the Ark by wagon from his father Avi Nadav’s (interesting name) house to Jerusalem, and inadvertently grasped the Ark when it became dislodged.  Although Uzziah intended no disrespect, HaShem struck him and he died.  If this could happen to Uzziah because of an accident, then how much more so Nadav and Abihu because of their deliberate actions.  Although King David, very much like Moses, was ultimately responsible for the care of the Ark, he like Moses was not punished.  However, King David was frightened enough not to move the Ark again for another three months.

WAS AARON HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

Notwithstanding that the Torah does not explicitly hold Aaron, Nadav and Abihu or any of Aaron’s children responsible for the sin of the golden calf; a case may be made for doing so.  Again, returning by example to King David in 2 Samuel 12:13-18: David sinned with Batsheva.  HaShem through the prophet Nathan called him to account.  David admitted his guilt; HaShem did not kill him, but the son born to David died seven days after having been born.  It could be that Aaron paid a similar price.

LESSON LEARNED

I think one of the lessons here is that leadership is an awful responsibility, one not to be taken lightly, not only for purposes of potential culpability, but because of possible dire consequences from inadvertent or deliberate errors in judgment.

I’ll leave it you as to who should take responsibility for the death of Nadav and Abihu. I myself like happy endings.  It could be as some say: their physical bodies were not up to being in such close proximity to the Divine Presence, and their spiritual souls just exited their physical bodies, only to be united with HaShem.


I realize that calling this account “THE KILLING OF NADAV AND ABIHU” and not “THE DEATH OF NADAV AND ABIHU” I am making a statement that their death was a deliberate act and not an accidental occurrence.

------------------------------------------------------------

At 10:8-9  -

וַיְדַבֵּר יְהוָה, אֶל-אַהֲרֹן לֵאמֹר
יַיִן וְשֵׁכָר אַל-תֵּשְׁתְּ אַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ אִתָּךְ, בְּבֹאֲכֶם אֶל-אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד--וְלֹא תָמֻתוּ:  חֻקַּת עוֹלָם, לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם
“And the Lord spoke to Aaron, saying, Do not drink wine that will lead to intoxication, neither you nor your sons with you, when you go into the Tent of Meeting, so that you shall not die. [This is] an eternal statute for your generations”

The prohibition against drinking wine is directed at the priests officiating in the Sanctuary. However this prohibition is true and good for any person who is required to discern and distinguish between things. A Judge is such a person.  A Judge is also forbidden to give a ruling or render a verdict when intoxicated.

However, get this from the 13 century Sefer HaChinuch 152:

“…And the prohibition of coming to the Temple in drunkenness is practiced at the time of the (Temple) by males and females. And the prevention of giving a ruling is in every place and at all times by males and so by a sage woman that is fitting to give a ruling.”

Does this mean that it is O.K. for a qualified woman  such as Deborah to interpret the Law and give Halachic rulings? 

Oy Vey… What are things coming to?

---------------------------------------------------------------------


At 11:6 we are commanded not to eat rabbits, אַרְנֶבֶת:

וְאֶת-הָאַרְנֶבֶת, כִּי-מַעֲלַת גֵּרָה הִוא, וּפַרְסָה, לֹא הִפְרִיסָה; טְמֵאָה הִוא, לָכֶם

“And the hare, because it brings up its cud, but does not have a cloven hoof; it is unclean for you”

An animal that chews its cud is called a ruminant. The hare or rabbit or אַרְנֶבֶת is not a ruminant although the scientist Carl Linnaeus, who formalized modern biologic nomenclature, at one time included the hare with other ruminants.  

What’s going on here? How can the Torah say that the rabbit chews its cud when science knows that it does not?

In terms of eating and digesting of its food, the hare does something close to ruminant behavior, but not exactly so. Rabbits eat a large amount of greens each morning. These are only partially digested and the remnants are excreted.  After some time the hare returns to have another go, this time on its half digested droppings…ugh.  It has the appearance of animal chewing its cud. Thus the Torah has come up with a warning not to eat hares because they do not have split hooves.
-------------------------------------