Pages

Saturday, March 26, 2022

TAZRIA - Leviticus 12:1 - 13:59, Rosh Chodesh Nisan, Shabbat HaChodesh

  TAZRIA -  Leviticus 12:1 - 13:59



This week we read Parshat Tazria.  It is also Rosh Chodesh Nisan and Shabbat Ha Chodesh. It is a busy week. On Shabbat three Torah scrolls will be taken out.

------------------------


 Tazaria,  תַזְרִיעַ means sow a seed or inseminated. 

Parshat Tazria begins by setting out the rules and purification rituals which govern a woman upon giving birth. In order to regain a status of ritual purity. She must undergo a time-related sanctification process. This process varies in length depending on whether she has given birth to a boy or a girl. It is 41 days for a male child and 81 days for a baby girl.

This raises a question: Why is additional time required when a mother has given birth to a girl?

The beginning of the ritual purification is set out at 12:2 (in part) -
אִשָּׁה כִּי תַזְרִיעַ, וְיָלְדָה זָכָר--וְטָמְאָה שִׁבְעַת יָמִים
"If a woman be delivered, and bear a man-child, then she shall be unclean seven days".

And continues at 12:5 -
וְאִם-נְקֵבָה תֵלֵד, וְטָמְאָה שְׁבֻעַיִם כְּנִדָּתָהּ; וְשִׁשִּׁים יוֹם וְשֵׁשֶׁת יָמִים, תֵּשֵׁב עַל-דְּמֵי טָהֳרָה
"And if she gives birth to a female, she shall be unclean for two weeks, like her menstruation. And for sixty six days, she shall remain in the blood of purity".



I think the reason for the additional time goes like this: 
During the period of gestation there is a presumption that the mother knows or thinks she knows that she is carrying a girl. At that point the mother realizes that it is incumbent upon her to pass on the superior wisdom and understanding, spirituality, sensitivity and teaching skills inherent in a woman to her unborn daughter.

She does this having in mind that one day the unborn daughter will have children of her own and likewise have the responsibility to educate them. Passing on this bounty to her unborn daughter depletes the mother of her natural gifts, and she needs more time to spiritually recover and resume her maternal responsibilities.

What do you think?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
At 12:3 -
וּבַיּוֹם, הַשְּׁמִינִי, יִמּוֹל, בְּשַׂר עָרְלָתוֹ
And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.

At Rabbi Seltzer's  shiur, Reb Yitz raised the question as to why the penis was chosen as the place to be snipped.  It could have been located somewhere else, a piece of an ear for instance.

The answer may be found in 19:23  where there is a three year prohibition from eating fruit from a newly planted fruit tree.
"וַעֲרַלְתֶּם עָרְלָתוֹ, אֶת-פִּרְיוֹ; שָׁלֹשׁ שָׁנִים, יִהְיֶה לָכֶם עֲרֵלִים--לֹא יֵאָכֵל..."

"... its fruit for three years will be uncircumcised;
 its fruit they shall be surely uncircumcised for you, three years it will be for you uncircumcised not to be eaten".

It seems that in order for the the fruit of a tree to be sanctified for eating, it is
 blocked or forbidden for a certain amount of time, and likewise our organ of creation must be sanctified by circumcision in order for it to be used.


-----------------------------------------------------------------


Outside the Camp
In Parashah Tazria at 13:46 provides that the person with skin disease "shall dwell alone; without the camp shall his dwelling be,".  

The Parshah Tazaria concerns a person punished with a spiritual disorder called צָּרַעַת, tzara'at.  It manifests itself on a person’s skin, something akin to psoriasis.  A Kohen is called upon to diagnose the disease.  

The only treatment offered for a person with tzara’at is quarantine for a period of time outside of the camp and shaving of the body.  After a period of time, if the treatment is effective as determined by the Kohen, the person undergoes a purification process.  Firstly the person immerses in a Mikveh, a sort of spiritual repair and cleansing.  The person must wait until the end of the day, for nightfall, and the beginning of a new day before entering back into the camp.  He is now permitted to partake in, to eat sacred food, the Korban, a part of the holy offering.  By consuming some of the Korban, the person has been fully restored to spiritual health

Tzara'at may also affect one’s clothing.  The Torah discusses "clothing tzara'at," a green or red discoloration which can affect certain types of materials. The garment is shown to a priest who quarantines it for up to two weeks.  At the conclusion of the quarantine period, depending on the circumstances the garment is either declared pure, or completely burnt, or only the part which was discolored is torn out and burnt.

We don't have this type of disease currently and we do not understand how all the details are relevant to our practical lives.  But we do know that there are times when our spiritual being has been diseased and requires repair and purification.

It is not difficult to connect the Torah readings with the situation that we have been facing for some time with the Covid 19 virus.  I’ll leave it to you to make your own conclusions
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Woodcut From The Cologne Bible 1478-80


The Tazria haftarah when we are not celebrating the new month is from  2 Kings 4:42 - 5:19 concerns  Naaman, a general in the Aramean army who is stricken with skin disease.  The prophet Elisha heals him by having Naaman immerse seven times in the Jordan River.  This episode takes place around 850 BCE, not in Judah where the Temple is located, but in Samaria, the Northern Kingdom.

The account opens up with a farmer bringing 20 loaves of barley bread to Elisha, the farmer's "first Fruits". This is interesting, among other things, in that the obligation of bringing Bikkurim is being followed in Samaria, and that Elisha must be a Kohen.
---------------------------------------------------------- 
 

Shabbat HaChodesh, Rosh Chodesh Nisan

Shabbat HaChodesh, the "Sabbath of the month" שבת החודש takes place on the Shabbat preceding the first of Nisan or on the 1st of Nisan.  A special maftir, Exodus 12:1-20 is read, in which the laws of Passover are defined. 

On the first day of Nisan, God presented the first commandment of how to "sanctify the new moon" (kiddush hachodesh) for the onset of Rosh Chodesh making Nisan  the first month of the Jewish year.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

Sunday, March 20, 2022

SHEMINI, LEVITICUS 9:1–11:47

 SHEMINI, LEVITICUS 9:1–11:47

In Parshat Shemini, Aaron’s two oldest sons, Nadav and Abihu, die at the hand of heaven when they bring “strange fire” before HaShem (Leviticus 10:1-2). 


THE KILLING OF NADAV AND ABIHU

WHO WERE RESPONSIBLE?

 The Sages and commentators offer many reasons for their death.  For example: their behavior was inappropriate because they were drunk or they did not seek permission from Moses or that they were in the Holy of Holies, and only the Kohen Gadol was authorized to enter the Holy of Holies.

I think however that the responsibility for their death lies in part with their father or perhaps with their uncle Moses, himself.  It all begins in the previous year, eight months before, in the month of Tammuz with the Sin of the Golden Calf:  Moses is away on Mt. Sinai, learning Torah from HaShem, and Aaron is in charge.  The Israelites become restive; Aaron calms them down; he makes a golden calf and proclaims the next day as a festival day (Exodus 32:1-6). 

Then early the next day, a festival day, the people bring Olah and Shlamim offerings to an altar that Aaron has erected. The Olah is the standard voluntary offering where the entire animal, except for its skin goes up to HaShem. It is a form of a gift, a thank you and by doing so, the offeror comes closer to HaShem.  The Shlamim is also voluntary, and also has a thank you connotation, but in this instance it is shared between HaShem, the priesthood and the offeror.  In both of these offerings there is a prescribed ritual  which Aaron’s sons are required to carry out which means that although Aaron may have made the golden calf, his sons assisted the populace in giving thanks to it.

HaShem becomes incensed; he vows to annihilate the entire population except for Moses, but Moses pleads on behalf of the people and calms HaShem down.  However, in the aftermath, the Sons of Levi by name, and not Aaron and his sons by name, slay three thousand of the evil-doers.  Additionally as a punishment, HaShem brings a plague against the Israelites. But in no instance does it appear that Aaron and his sons are held accountable, at least not at this juncture.

Fast forward one year later to the 1st of Nissan, the Mishkan has been completed and ready to be activated as a resting place for HaShem.  Aaron and his sons, including Nadav and Abihu the eldest of them, have been personally trained by Moses as to how to carry out their duties.  Nadav and Abihu are consumed by a heavenly fire. And the question is…Who is responsible for their deaths?

WERE THE BROTHERS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OWN DEATHS?

The Sages and commentators place the responsibility on the two brothers themselves.  Support for this position can be found in the narrative of the death of Uzziah (2Samuel 6:3-7).  At King David’s direction, Uzziah was helping to transport the Ark by wagon from his father Avi Nadav’s (interesting name) house to Jerusalem, and inadvertently grasped the Ark when it became dislodged.  Although Uzziah intended no disrespect, HaShem struck him and he died.  If this could happen to Uzziah because of an accident, then how much more so Nadav and Abihu because of their deliberate actions.  Although King David, very much like Moses, was ultimately responsible for the care of the Ark, he like Moses was not punished.  However, King David was frightened enough not to move the Ark again for another three months.

WAS AARON HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

Notwithstanding that the Torah does not explicitly hold Aaron, Nadav and Abihu or any of Aaron’s children responsible for the sin of the golden calf; a case may be made for doing so.  Again, returning by example to King David in 2 Samuel 12:13-18: David sinned with Batsheva.  HaShem through the prophet Nathan called him to account.  David admitted his guilt; HaShem did not kill him, but the son born to David died seven days after having been born.  It could be that Aaron paid a similar price.

LESSON LEARNED

I think one of the lessons here is that leadership is an awful responsibility, one not to be taken lightly, not only for purposes of potential culpability, but because of possible dire consequences from inadvertent or deliberate errors in judgment.

I’ll leave it you as to who should take responsibility for the death of Nadav and Abihu. I myself like happy endings.  It could be as some say: their physical bodies were not up to being in such close proximity to the Divine Presence, and their spiritual souls just exited their physical bodies, only to be united with HaShem.


I realize that calling this account “THE KILLING OF NADAV AND ABIHU” and not “THE DEATH OF NADAV AND ABIHU” I am making a statement that their death was a deliberate act and not an accidental occurrence.

------------------------------------------------------------

At 10:8-9  -

וַיְדַבֵּר יְהוָה, אֶל-אַהֲרֹן לֵאמֹר
יַיִן וְשֵׁכָר אַל-תֵּשְׁתְּ אַתָּה וּבָנֶיךָ אִתָּךְ, בְּבֹאֲכֶם אֶל-אֹהֶל מוֹעֵד--וְלֹא תָמֻתוּ:  חֻקַּת עוֹלָם, לְדֹרֹתֵיכֶם
“And the Lord spoke to Aaron, saying, Do not drink wine that will lead to intoxication, neither you nor your sons with you, when you go into the Tent of Meeting, so that you shall not die. [This is] an eternal statute for your generations”

The prohibition against drinking wine is directed at the priests officiating in the Sanctuary. However this prohibition is true and good for any person who is required to discern and distinguish between things. A Judge is such a person.  A Judge is also forbidden to give a ruling or render a verdict when intoxicated.

However, get this from the 13 century Sefer HaChinuch 152:

“…And the prohibition of coming to the Temple in drunkenness is practiced at the time of the (Temple) by males and females. And the prevention of giving a ruling is in every place and at all times by males and so by a sage woman that is fitting to give a ruling.”

Does this mean that it is O.K. for a qualified woman  such as Deborah to interpret the Law and give Halachic rulings? 

Oy Vey… What are things coming to?

---------------------------------------------------------------------


At 11:6 we are commanded not to eat rabbits, אַרְנֶבֶת:

וְאֶת-הָאַרְנֶבֶת, כִּי-מַעֲלַת גֵּרָה הִוא, וּפַרְסָה, לֹא הִפְרִיסָה; טְמֵאָה הִוא, לָכֶם

“And the hare, because it brings up its cud, but does not have a cloven hoof; it is unclean for you”

An animal that chews its cud is called a ruminant. The hare or rabbit or אַרְנֶבֶת is not a ruminant although the scientist Carl Linnaeus, who formalized modern biologic nomenclature, at one time included the hare with other ruminants.  

What’s going on here? How can the Torah say that the rabbit chews its cud when science knows that it does not?

In terms of eating and digesting of its food, the hare does something close to ruminant behavior, but not exactly so. Rabbits eat a large amount of greens each morning. These are only partially digested and the remnants are excreted.  After some time the hare returns to have another go, this time on its half digested droppings…ugh.  It has the appearance of animal chewing its cud. Thus the Torah has come up with a warning not to eat hares because they do not have split hooves.
--------------------------------------------------------------
From the OU:

On the Shabbat after Purim, two Torah Scrolls are removed from the Ark. The Sidrah of the week is read from the first, and from the second, the chapter of Parah Adumah, the Red Cow (or Red Heifer), is read. It gives the procedure through which people can purify themselves from the contamination caused by a human corpse.

The reading of this chapter was instituted for this time of the year because Jews were required to purify themselves before coming to Jerusalem for the pilgrimage festival of Passover.

The Haftarah read on the Sabbath of Parashat Parah is from Ezekiel 36:16-38 and 

at 36:25 contains the verse,

 וְזָרַקְתִּי עֲלֵיכֶם מַיִם טְהוֹרִים, וּטְהַרְתֶּם:  מִכֹּל טֻמְאוֹתֵיכֶם וּמִכָּל-גִּלּוּלֵיכֶם, אֲטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם.

“And I shall sprinkle pure water upon you, that you be cleansed. From all your contamination and from all your filth I will cleanse you” 

 There are other parallels in the Haftarah between the concepts of sin represented by contamination, and atonement represented by purity.

--------------------------------------------------------------






Saturday, March 5, 2022

VAYIKRA, 1:1- 5:26

 


QUESTIONS FOR THE SHABBOS TABLE
PARSHAS ,VAYIKRA, 1:1- 5:26



We start a new Book this week, Vayikra or Leviticus.



At Vayikra 1:2 it says:”When a person from you will sacrifice an offering to the Lord; from animals, from cattle or from the flock you shall sacrifice your offering”.


אָדָם כִּי-יַקְרִיב מִכֶּם קָרְבָּן, לַיהוָה--מִן-הַבְּהֵמָה, מִן-הַבָּקָר וּמִן-הַצֹּאן, תַּקְרִיבוּ, אֶת-קָרְבַּנְכֶם

Offering a sacrifice, in this case an animal, was the means for people at that time to come closer to God.

Rabbi Riskin expands on the term “from you” as meaning what does Hashem want from us?
He concludes that in making sacrifices today, Hashem wants us to give of ourselves, upfront and personal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This week’s parsha begins with the word Vayikra: א ויקר   On all Torah scrolls the letter א is small…Why?
It was always seen as a symbol of the intense modesty of Moshe. But there is another explanation of the small aleph that Rabbi Berel Wein teaches us:
Hashem is to be seen and heard in the small things in life and not only in the large, great events. Hashem tells Elijah that He is not to be found in the wind, the noise of a quake, the brightness of a burning fire but rather in the still, small voice, in the sound of a whisper and not of a shout.

The still, small voice is most representative of God and his omnipotence. Science has shown us in our time that our physical appearance, if not even our longevity and health, lie in small almost invisible strands that make up our DNA. God calls out with a small aleph to his creatures – to see Him in every aspect of life, no matter how small and insignificant it may appear on its surface.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The word “offering” or “sacrifice” is Korban or קָרְבָּן. The three letter root is קרב.
A verb having this root is לְהִתְקַרֵב , to come closer. Try squeezing out more meanings for קָרְבָּן.

Juggling the letters of the root yields the following possibilities:
רֵבקַ damn רקב decay ברק lightning בקר beef קַברֵ grave 
קַרֵב interior
Are we not the People of the Book, or what?
---------------------------------------------------------------

                                            

 

In the Parsha there is a specific commandment, 2:13, that the grain offering (the Minchah) requires salt. This is followed by a general statement that all sacrifices require salt, hence the custom to have salt at our Shabbos table where table is symbolic of the Altar on which sacrifices were placed.

וְכָל-קָרְבַּן מִנְחָתְךָ, בַּמֶּלַח תִּמְלָח, וְלֹא תַשְׁבִּית מֶלַח בְּרִית אֱלֹהֶיךָ, מֵעַל מִנְחָתֶךָ; עַל כָּל-קָרְבָּנְךָ, תַּקְרִיב מֶלחַ
“And every meal-offering of yours you shall season with salt; neither shall you omit the salt covenant of your God to be lacking from your meal-offerings; with all your offerings you shall offer salt”.

A question: What is the salt covenant?

Offerings must not lack salt. This is a commandment and as such does not need to be understood. (That does not mean that we should not try to understand the commandment.) The commandment is part of a covenant, the “salt covenant”. Apparently the commandment a legally binding agreement that Hashem has imposed upon us. And Hashem’s obligations under the covenant, if any, are not stated.

In the Book of Numbers 18:19, God's covenant with the priesthood is said to be a covenant of salt. In the second book of Chronicles 13:5, God's covenant with the Davidic kings of Israel is also described as a covenant of salt. A covenant of salt most likely means that the covenant is a perpetual covenant, because of the use of salt as a preservative.


A question: What is it about salt that makes it so important to Hashem?

Try these facts to come up with your answer.  Oceans are salty.  They are comprised by about 35% salt.  98% of all the water on our planet is salty.  Lakes, rivers and underground water comprise only 2% of the Earth’s water.  All original life stemmed from sea water.  Layers of salt, “rock salt”, are only the remains of ocean water that has evaporated.
My answer: There is a fundamental connection, evidenced by salt,  between the creation of life and life’s Creator. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Parsha Vayikra we are instructed about the variety of offerings that are to be made to Hashem. The first offering that is discussed is known as the עולה, which is not shared with the public or the priests (except for the hides), but is entirely dedicated to Hashem.

עולה has in its narrow meaning something that is raised up. It is no coincidence that an immigrant Israeli is also referred to as an עולה. Native born Israelis, sabras as they are called, are great in their own right, but the עולה has special meaning to Hashem and for Israel. Be proud. Walk tall.

An
 
עולה (Oleh) who in English-speaker is called an Anglo. An Anglo עולה is commonly depicted by native born Israelis as cowboys whether or not they hail from the USA, as they are often Canadians, Brits, Australians, South African and the like.
In 2015,  Anglo’s living in Nahariya, Israel, dressed as cowboys marched in the city’s Purim parade.  Here’s what we looked like:


In the USA in the 1800's the westward movement brought many distinct ethnicities all with their own. cultural traditions. In a way Israel is like that.
In terms of persistent stereotypes I like to think that cowboys represent  the encouragement of  honorable behavior, respect and patriotism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

What will the rebuilt Temple be like? Will we really offer animal sacrifices once again?

These are some views on the subject held by Rav Kook as interpreted by Channon Morison:

In the writings of the Kabbalists, we find a remarkable description of how the universe will look in the future.  All aspects of the universe will be elevated. Even the animals in that future era will be different. Animals will advance to the level of people today (Sha’ar Hamitzvot of the Ari z"l). Obviously, no sacrifice could be offered from such humanlike animals. At that time, there will no longer be strife and conflict between inhabitants of the world. 

Human beings for their own physical, moral, and spiritual needs will no longer take the lives of animals.

 ------------------------------------------------------------

More from Rav Kook?
Is fasting a substitute for bringing a sacrifice?

When the fourth-century scholar Rav Sheshet fasted, he would add the following request to his Amidah (Standing) prayer:

“Master of the Universe! You know that when the Temple stood, a person who sinned would bring a sacrifice. Although only the fats and blood would be offered on the altar, the person would be granted atonement.

Now I have fasted, and my fat and my blood have diminished. May it be Your Will that the decrease in my fat and my blood should be considered as if I offered them on the altar, and my offering was accepted.” (Berachot 17a)

Rav Sheshet’s prayer is inspiring, but it makes one wonder: Why should one go to the trouble of bringing a sacrifice if the same atonement may be achieved through fasting?

Coming forward to today let me add my 2 cents:

I probably fast five days a week. An individual fast may last as little as 12 hours or as much as 20 hours.  I drink water or tea or black coffee during a fast.

When you have fasted for 12 hours,  amazing things begin to happen:

Your insulin level begins to drop which is a guarantee of becoming healthier. Also a cascade of Human Growth Hormone begins, and this will  strengthens your bones, increase your muscle mass, strengthen your immune system and slow down the aging process.  As the hours increase things get better and better.

At around 16 hours or more your body on a cellular level experiences a phenomenon called autophagy:

Autophagy is the body's way of cleaning out damaged cells, in order to regenerate newer, healthier cells. The body removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components Consider it as a form of recycling or waste management.

Now, relating fasting to sacrifice, think of this: Offering sacrifices was a form of purification.  You offer the sacrifice and you come out a better or "cleaner" person.
Fasting will do the same.  Rav Sheshet in the 4th century was on to something good.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

“You shall not forget!”

This Shabbos is called Shabbat Zachor – of Remembrance

Shabbat Zachor "Sabbath of remembrance שבת זכור is the Shabbat immediately preceding Purim. Deuteronomy 25:17-19 describing the attack on the weakest of us by Amalek, is recounted. There is a tradition from the Talmud that Haman, the antagonist of the Purim story, was descended from Amalek. The portion that is read includes a commandment to remember the attack by Amalek, and therefore at this public reading both men and women make a special effort to hear the reading.

“You shall remember what Amalek did to you on the way, when you went out of Egypt, how he happened upon you on the way and cut off all the stragglers at your rear, when you were faint and weary, and he did not fear God.

Therefore, it will be, when the Lord your God grants you respite from all your enemies around [you] in the land which the Lord, your God, gives to you as an inheritance to possess, that you shall obliterate the remembrance of Amalek from beneath the heavens”.

“You shall not forget!”

We were entering a “bad neighborhood”.  It was bad then and it is still bad today.

And there is a lesson to be learned in connection with a “bad neighborhood”:

Moshe should have known that there were stragglers who were vulnerable, and needed rear-guard protection. 

A leader is responsible for the well-being of his people. This was true then. It is true today.

-------------------------------------------------------

The haftarah for Shabbat Zachor, 1 Samuel 15:2–34 or 15:1–34, describes Saul's encounter with Amalek and Saul's and Samuel's treatment of the Amalekite king Agag.

 Purim, in turn, commemorates the story of Esther and the Jewish people's victory over Haman's plan to kill the Jews, told in the book of Esther.  Esther 3:1 identifies Haman as an Agagite, and thus a descendant of Amalek.

Numbers 24:7 identifies the Agagites with the Amalekites.

----------------------------------------------------------


This week we celebrated International Woman’s Day:

You are strong.

You are fearless.

You are a Jewish Israeli woman.