Pages

Saturday, October 30, 2021

TOLDOT 25:19-28:-28:9

 

TOLDOT 25:19-28:-28:9





In this week's parshah at 26:12, one of the things that intrigues me is that Isaac is a farmer, not only a herdsman, and he does alright for a tiller of the soil.

יב  וַיִּזְרַע יִצְחָק בָּאָרֶץ הַהִוא, וַיִּמְצָא בַּשָּׁנָה הַהִוא מֵאָה שְׁעָרִים; וַיְבָרְכֵהוּ, יְהוָה.

"And Isaac sowed in that land, and he found in that year a hundred fold, and the Lord blessed him".

His Philistine neighbors became jealous of his success.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  


: Simeon Solomon, 1863. © Victoria & Albert Museum.
     
In this week's Parshah we learn about the powerful spirituality of Isaac and Rebecca:

ַיֶּעְתַּ֨ר יִצְחָ֤ק לַֽיהֹוָה֙ לְנֹ֣כַח אִשְׁתּ֔וֹ כִּ֥י עֲקָרָ֖ה הִ֑וא

At 25:21 "Isaac pleaded (or prayed) to the Lord on behalf his wife because she was barren..."

And we learn at 25:22 when Rebecca became pregnant with twins they struggled within her, and she sought an answer from Hashem as to what was going on.

וַתֵּ֖לֶךְ לִדְר֥שׁ אֶת־יְהֹוָֽה

" And she went to demand of Hashem".
--------------------------------------------------------------------







Where was Esau when Isaac needed him? Esau is touted as being a hunter, a man of the field for which he was very much loved by his passive father, Isaac.

But when Isaac is continuously being bullied, harassed and pushed around by his Philistine neighbors where was Esau?: The Philistines stopped up the wells that had been dug by Abraham (26:15); they force Isaac to move (26:16); he had to move once more because of a quarrel over water (26:22); and finally Isaac settles away from the Philistines and moves to Beersheva (26:23).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Parsha clearly illustrates that underground water is a property right that rests with the owners of the land. Wells are dug, stopped up and dug again. Isaac is not a land owner, but a sojourner who resides at the tender mercies of his Philistine host. Keep in mind that the Philistines are not native to the land, but acquired their property right by force of arms.

In modern times the right to well water is illustrated in the film “Lawrence of Arabia”. On a journey, Lawrence’s Bedouin guide is killed by Sherif Ali for drinking from the Sherif’s well without permission.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ud1zpHW3ito


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Esau takes a 3rd wife, one of uncle Ishmael's daughters


In the Parsha at  26:35 Essau at age 40 marries two Hittite (Canaanite) women. Marrying these Canaanite women results in bitterness to  Rivkah and Jacob .

וַתִּהְיֶיןָ, מֹרַת רוּחַ, לְיִצְחָק, וּלְרִבְקָה

"And they were a bitterness to the spirit  of Isaac and to Rivkah.”



This negative emotion is similar to that expressed by Job (Iyov) at 7:11 -

גַּם-אֲנִי, לֹא אֶחֱשָׂךְ-פִּי
אֲדַבְּרָה, בְּצַר רוּחִי; אָשִׂיחָה, בְּמַר נַפְשִׁי.


“Neither will I restrain my mouth; I will speak with the anguish of my spirit, I will complain with the bitterness of my soul.”



On its face, It is difficult to see from the text how the two Canaanite brides would be any different than the two Aramean women that Jacob eventually married. They were all idol worshippers.

At 28:8-9, upon hearing of his parent's preferences for a suitable mate, Esau marries a daughter of Ishmael, in addition to the two Canaanite wives he already had.

  וַיַּרְא עֵשָׂו, כִּי רָעוֹת בְּנוֹת כְּנָעַן, בְּעֵינֵי, יִצְחָק אָבִיו.
                      ...וַיֵּלֶךְ עֵשָׂו, אֶל-יִשְׁמָעֵאל; וַיִּקַּח אֶת-מָחֲלַת בַּת-יִשְׁמָעֵאל

"And Esau saw that the daughters of Canaan were displeasing to his father Isaac. So Esau went to Ishmael, and he took Mahalath, the daughter of Ishmael..."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Some of the negative stereotypes about Jews in regard to "Economic Anti-Semitism” or deception of gentiles may be found in the Parsha:

The “swindling” by the bookish brother Jacob of the birthright belonging to his manly brother Esau; 
the deception of Isaac by Rivka and Jacob in obtaining by trickery the material blessing earmarked for Esau.

Anti-Semitism is a hostility that prejudices or discriminates or demonizes against Jews. In support of his prejudice, the Anti-Semite marks Jews as carrying deviant racial characteristics. We Jews are characterized by the Anti-Semite as not only being partially bad, but totally bad by our inherent nature, that we have inborn incorrigible traits.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




REVISITING THINGS TURKISH: A LESSON IN LIFE


As a boy my favorite 5₵ candy bar was Bonomo’s Turkish Taffy. It was chewy and lasted a long time. I’ve since come to learn that Bonomo’s Turkish Taffy is neither Turkish nor taffy, but I’m good with that. For me it’s a lesson in life.
I also enjoy Turkish coffee, and the orange juice on Turkish Airlines in my opinion is the best in the world. But recently I have been given pause to reflect on things Turkish.

In the the Turkish language, the word for “Jew” is kazıkçı satıcı. OK you ask, so what’s the point? Well, I’ll tell you what’s the point: kazıkçı satıcı is inherent anti-Semitism. It is a permanent, essential, characteristic attribute of you and me. It is how the Turks regard us. Kazıkçı satıcı means “swindler or deceiver or trickster”…another lesson in life.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------






In the Parshah, from 27:1 - 27:27 we are presented with infirmities associated with advancing years, a phenomenon not unfamiliar to many of us Olim:

Isaac although blind still has a sense of taste and is able to smell and hear. He sends Esau out to get some venison and to make a sweet stew that he very much hopes to enjoy

In the interim, Jacob tries to deceive Isaac. The old man's suspicions are aroused. He senses something odd about the voice of this son asking for a blessing. The boy is hairy like Esau and smells like Esau, but the voice is not quite right. What to do?


Deception, deceit, pathos, anger, fear and flight; this is a tale packed with emotion.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacob could also have taken a wife from among the Canaanites as did Esau.
But Rebecca would have none of that:
 וַתֹּאמֶר רִבְקָה, אֶל-יִצְחָק, קַצְתִּי בְחַיַּי, מִפְּנֵי בְּנוֹת חֵת; אִם-לֹקֵחַ יַעֲקֹב אִשָּׁה מִבְּנוֹת-חֵת כָּאֵלֶּה, מִבְּנוֹת הָאָרֶץ--לָמָּה לִּי, חַיִּים.

At 27:46 -"And Rebecca said to Isaac, "I am disgusted with my life because of the daughters of Heth. If Jacob takes a wife of the daughters of Heth like these, from the daughters of the land, of what use is life to me?"

--------------------------------------------------------

At 28:1-2 Jacob is told by his father to go to Aram, to his Great Uncle Bethuel, and there take a wife from among his Uncle Lavan's daughters. 

Hypothetically, Jacob had other choices:
1. He could have been told to go to his Uncle Ishmael's, and take a wife from among Uncle Ishmael’s daughters.

And remember that Ishmael had received a blessing from Hashem at 17:20 in which he would be fruitful, increase in numbers and be the father of 12 princes. As for Bethuel and his son Lavan there is no such blessing. On its face then, going to Ishmael seems the better deal for Jacob.

Speculation: If Jacob had found his soulmate in Uncle Ishmael’s house, and if Hagar turned out to be Pharaoh’s daughter as the Midrash says, then all kinds of good things could have happened.

2. He could have gone to Uncle Lot who had two perhaps available daughters,
3. And if Jacob was worried enough about Esau, he could have sought the protection of Avimelech.

Thank you for playing this What If game with me:

OK, I know: If my Grandmother had a beard she would be my Grandfather.


The obsession to marry only into one's own family, and to marry well calls into question among other things, Abraham's marriage to Keturah.  
What was that about?

In today's world, marrying outside the family brings into question assimilation and Jewish survival, Caroline Glick has an opinion on this issue:



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Haftarah: Malachi 1:1-2:7
We know that there were problems with the Priesthood from the get-go.
Malachi picks up into their descent into oblivion somewhere along the way.

The consensus is that prophesized during the Persian period. 
Malachi tells us that the Priests turned away from the correct path, corrupted their covenant, and offered blemished sacrifices.
----------------------------------------------------------------
REVISITING ISHMAEL THROUGH THE ABRAHAM ACCORDS


Ishmael the Archer

On September 15, 2020 Israel, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain signed a Peace Treaty called the Abraham Accords. This name hearkens back to Abraham, the father of Ishmael and Isaac, two brothers who are the progenitors of Islam and Judaism, the Muslim nations and the State of Israel.

THINGS THAT WE KNOW ABOUT ISHMAEL
  • The name יִשְׁמָעֵֽאל Yishmaʿel means 'God will listen', suggesting that God fulfills His promises.
  • He will love the wilderness and to hunt.
  • Ishmael will not be domesticated. He will contend with his brethren.
  • “…he dwelt in the wilderness, and he became an archer”.
Isaac, in contrast to his Father and to Ishmael, was a passive individual. In Hebrew his name is Yitzchak, יִצְחָק means “he will laugh”.  I think he was a pleasant person; perhaps he had a benevolent smile.  When he meets his future wife, he loves her.

When Abraham passed away both brothers cooperated in a spirit of peace, shared interest and respect.  At 25:9 -

וַיִּקְבְּרוּ אֹתוֹ יִצְחָק וְיִשְׁמָעֵאל, בָּנָיו, אֶל-מְעָרַת, הַמַּכְפֵּלָה

“And Isaac and Ishmael his [Abraham's] sons buried him [Abraham] in the cave of Machpelah,”

As promised by the Angel to Haggar (21:18) : Ishmael will father many children/  Ishmael had 12 sons, each a tribal leader. I take this as meaning that Ishmael will be the Father of the Arab people, much in the way that Jacob is the Father of the Jewish people.  They each had 12 Tribes.

 I think that when Ishmael spent his formative years under Abraham’s roof that he learned and accepted the concept of one God, the Creator.  His children learned from him just as did the children of Jacob.  I think Ishmael’s influence paved the way for Mohammed and for Muslims everywhere.



Jews and Muslims, if not exactly brothers, are surely cousins. The Abraham Accords brings about a time in which Jews and Muslims can live together in the spirit of peace.  We have shared interests and a shared heritage.  It leads to healing and makes for a better future.

Amen.












Sunday, October 24, 2021

CHAYEI SARAH 23:1-25:18

 CHAYEI SARAH 23:1-25:18

 


 -------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Parsha opens up with the death of Sarah.  Many commentators juxtapose her passing with the conclusion of the previous Parsha where Abraham is commanded to sacrifice Isaac, Sarah’s only son.  In the nick of time the sacrifice is prevented; both father and son go their separate ways.

Yet, Sarah dies.  Is Sarah what some would call: collateral damage?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                           

The name of the Torah portion is Chaya Sarah, the Life of Sarah. It seems to me that Sarah’s life was filled with vicissitudes, ups and downs, many of which were unpleasant or uncertain and created feelings of anxiety:

Striking out on her own along with her husband Abraham she ventured into Canaan, a foreign land. Sarah witnessed the destruction of Sodom.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Coins had not yet been invented. 
 Abraham had to weigh out the 400 shekel purchase price.


At 23:16, Abraham purchase a grave site for 400 shekels.

  וַיִּשְׁקֹ֤ל אַבְרָהָם֙ לְעֶפְרֹ֔ן אֶת־הַכֶּ֕סֶף אֲשֶׁ֥ר דִּבֶּ֖ר בְּאָזְנֵ֣י בְנֵי־חֵ֑ת אַרְבַּ֤ע מֵאוֹת֙ שֶׁ֣קֶל כֶּ֔סֶף

...Abraham weighed out to Ephron the silver that he had named in the hearing of the sons of Heth, four hundred shekels of silver...


In the land of Judah the system of measurement for weights was based on the Shekel. The shekel had many sub-units. This meant things could be weighed by half a shekel, or commonly in multiples of 2, 4, and 8 and deviations of Beqa, Pym, and Nesef. The system was centered on the shekel of c. 11.33g.



400 shekels X 11.4 grams/shekel = 4560 grams

4560 grams / 28.35 grams/ounce = 160.85 ounces

160.85 ounces X $24.36/ounce = $3,918
---------------------------------------------------------

For 400 shekels at 23:20 Abraham purchased a burial plot from a Hittite.

וַיָּ֨קָם הַשָּׂדֶ֜ה וְהַמְּעָרָ֧ה אֲשֶׁר־בּ֛וֹ לְאַבְרָהָ֖ם לַֽאֲחֻזַּת־קָ֑בֶר מֵאֵ֖ת בְּנֵי־חֵֽת

“And the field and the cave within it were established to Abraham as burial property from the sons of Heth”.

Who were the sons of Heth, בְּנֵי־חֵֽת?

They are often called Hittites, but this is a misnomer.

They are Canaanites, and are descended from Canaan, a grandchild of Noah.

At 10:15 -

וּכְנַ֗עַן יָלַ֛ד אֶת־צִידֹ֥ן בְּכֹר֖וֹ וְאֶת־חֵֽת

“And Canaan’s offspring were Zidon his firstborn and Heth.

צִידֹ֥ן  I guess is the city of Sidon to the north in today's Lebanon.

The חֵֽת are in Hevron.  The root of Hevron is חבר, friend.

------------------------------------------------------------------


In a previous Parshah, Hashem says to Abraham, Go, for you, your family, your country, your father's house..." (Bereishis 12:1-3).

In this week's Parshah, we have Rebecca (Rivkah) at 24:58 making the same move.  In this matter her personality is similar to that of her trail blazing future father-in-law and deceased mother-in-law.

וַיִּקְרְא֤וּ לְרִבְקָה֙ וַיֹּֽאמְר֣וּ אֵלֶ֔יהָ הֲתֵֽלְכִ֖י עִם־הָאִ֣ישׁ הַזֶּ֑ה וַתֹּ֖אמֶר אֵלֵֽךְ

And they called Rebecca, and they said to her, "Will you go with this man?" And she said, "I will go."

Isaac, by comparison is different.  Hashem does not permit to leave the Land.  He has herds and flocks, but more importantly he is a successful farmer and grows crops. He is not a wanderer; he is a consolidator.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

At 24:60 as Rebecca is about to begin her journey, her brother and father bless her: 

וַיְבָרְכוּ אֶת-רִבְקָה, וַיֹּאמְרוּ לָהּ--אֲחֹתֵנוּ, אַתְּ הֲיִי לְאַלְפֵי רְבָבָה; וְיִירַשׁ זַרְעֵךְ, אֵת שַׁעַר שֹׂנְאָיו.

"And they blessed Rebecca and said to her, "Our sister, may you become countless thousands, and may your seed inherit the gate of those who hate them."
This blessing is similar to the blessings given to Abraham by God in Chapter 17, particularly in verse 8 where as part of the covenant Abraham's descendent are given the land of Canaan.
And for me, living in this Land today, a land once occupied by my enemies, it is my inheritance.

-----------------------------------------------------
From the World of Rabbi Avraham Kook:

“If we truly look at the good side of every individual, we will develop an inherent affection for them without having to lie to ourselves about their bad traits. This is because if we take an interest in the good in them that we encounter constantly, this will truly conceal from us all their bad traits...” (Erpalei Tohar 107) adapted from Machon Meir.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Haftorah portion for the parsha comes from 1Kings: 1-31.
It is filled with drama and Halachic questions, and is well worth reading.  Some of the major themes are:
1. David is very old and a "bed-warmer" is selected for him.
2. Adonijah, one of David's sons, declares himself to be king.
3.  Bathsheba, supported by the Prophet Nathan, wants her son Solomon to be king.

By way of example the commentators have a field day with the term "bed-warmer" and all its many ramifications. 
 So should you:

Let’s explore a little deeper one of the issues:

 David is cold. His servants decide that he needs a “warmer”.

וּתְהִי־ל֖וֹ סֹכֶ֑נֶת

1:2,  and she shall be to him a warmer.

There is controversy among the commentators as to what a סֹכֶ֑נֶת is.  Rashi says “warmer”; others translate it as “near” or “treasurer” or “helper”. 

David seems to be passive in his acquiescence. Do we condone the immodest solution because it may be a medical proposal? 

וְהַמֶּ֖לֶךְ לֹ֥א יְדָעָֽהּ

1:4, And the king did not know her.

They were not intimate…Why?  David was supposed to be robust in his manhood.  Was this then a self-imposed punishment or maybe he was doing teshuva for the sin with Bathsheva?

Could David been suffering from Alzheimer’s or some cognitive dysfunction?

Lot’s of questions…many answers.






Saturday, October 16, 2021

VAYEIRA 18:1-22:24

 VAYEIRA 18:1-22:24

 


So you think that you had a busy week: In this week's Parshah, Abraham is visited by three angels and is promised a son. The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are destroyed.  Sarah gives birth to Isaac at the age of 90, Hagar and Ishmael are banished.  Gd orders Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac.

------------------------------------------------

Abraham is visited by three angels:

What exactly are Angels?

At 18:1 Abraham senses that his visitors are special, and he runs to them.

וַיִּשָּׂ֤א עֵינָיו֙ וַיַּ֔רְא וְהִנֵּה֙ שְׁלשָׁ֣ה אֲנָשִׁ֔ים נִצָּבִ֖ים עָלָ֑יו וַיַּ֗רְא וַיָּ֤רָץ 

“And he lifted his eyes and saw, and behold, three men were standing beside him, and he saw and he ran toward them…” 

In this instance Abraham’s visitors are described as men, אֲנָשִׁ֔ים.

At 19:1, They are described as Angels or messengers, מַּלְאָכִים

וַיָּבֹאוּ שְׁנֵי הַמַּלְאָכִים סְדֹמָה

“And the two angels came to Sodom…”

Of the three Angels or messengers from Hashem, one had the task of informing Abraham of the future birth of Isaac, and the remaining two had the task in assisting the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.

 Much later on, at 28:12 Jacob has a vision of Angels going up and down on a ladder.  These are referred to as מַלְאֲכֵיLikewise at  32:2 when Jacob enters Canaan he is greeted by מַלְאֲכֵי.

Still later on at 32:25, Jacob wrestles with a supernatural being, who is called a man, אִישׁ .

In the Chumash, Angels are nameless.  It is only in the Book of Daniel that Angels are named: Gabriel and Michael. 

---------------------------------------------------------

The cities of Sodom and Gomorrah are destroyed:

At 19: 24 and 25 we learn about the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah:

וַֽיהֹוָ֗ה הִמְטִ֧יר עַל־סְדֹ֛ם וְעַל־עֲמֹרָ֖ה גָּפְרִ֣ית וָאֵ֑שׁ מֵאֵ֥ת יְהֹוָ֖ה מִן־הַשָּׁמָֽיִם

“And the Lord caused to rain down upon Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire, from the Lord, from heaven”.

וַיַּֽהֲפֹךְ֙ אֶת־הֶֽעָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֔ל וְאֵ֖ת כָּל־הַכִּכָּ֑ר וְאֵת֙ כָּל־יֽשְׁבֵ֣י הֶֽעָרִ֔ים וְצֶ֖מַח הָֽאֲדָמָֽה

“And He turned over these cities and the entire plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and the vegetation of the ground”.

The destruction had two elements: The raining down of fiery sulfur and an earthquake that overturned the cities.  Where were these cities located? 

Sodom and Gomorrah were located in the Jordan Valley, a geologic rift zone characterized by earthquakes.  I would guess they were close to what is now the Dead Sea.  In the Dead Sea today there are seeps of natural asphalt or bitumen.

And we learned at 14:16  that in the battle of the fives kings and four kings there were pits of asphalt:

 וְעֵמֶק הַשִּׂדִּים, בֶּאֱרֹת בֶּאֱרֹת חֵמָר

 “The valley of Daemons was full of bitumen (asphalt) pits”

 It must have been a forbidding, foul-smelling place.  I’m guessing that anaerobic bacteria lived off of the sulfur contained in the asphalt, producing hydrogen sulfide that has a rotten egg smell and native sulfur.  This is the phenomenon that place in Louisiana and Texas where there are economic salt and sulfur deposits. 

With the raw materials on-hand plus an earthquake, you have the elements of destruction. Sulfur is easily ignited,, hydrogen sulfide is a deadly gas and for good measure sulfuric acid is able to be produced, culminating in an acid rain…what a catastrophe!

------------------------------------------------------------

 Lot and His Daughters (or Let's Hop on Pop):

 

                                                 Lucas Cranach the Elder, 1528

Lot was Abraham’s nephew, the son of Abraham’s deceased brother Haran.  Sara was his Aunt.  Terach was his grandfather.  Lot like the rest of the family was a Sumerian.  He chose to live in Sodom.  The question is why?

On its face, Sodom was not a place for any of Abraham’s family, who for want of a better term were straight-laced.  And Sodom at the very least was a city of questionable morality, I speculate that unlike the rest of the family, Lot belonged to that group of Sumerians who in matters of sexual intimacy were lax if not indulgent.

When Sodom’s townspeople wanted to have “their way” with Lot’s guests, he volunteered his daughters in their stead. At first I thought this repugnant,  but on refection I am of the opinion that the daughters were part of the scene and not horrified as to what might have happened.

Furthermore when the daughters are in the cave with their father, at  19:31, one says:

אָבִ֣ינוּ זָקֵ֑ן וְאִ֨ישׁ אֵ֤ין בָּאָ֨רֶץ֙ לָב֣וֹא עָלֵ֔ינוּ כְּדֶ֖רֶךְ כָּל־הָאָֽרֶץ

 "…Our father is old, and there is no man on earth to come onto us, as is the manner of all the earth”.

I think that the daughters were not concerned whether or not mankind had been destroyed, but were simply behaving in the manner of the erstwhile Sodom population.  And Lot went along with the program.

Five hundred years later we learn in Devarim 25:4-5 about the sweeping prohibition against marrying an Ammonite or Moabite, offspring from the incest between Lot and his daughters:

 “No Ammonite or Moabite shall be admitted into the congregation of the Lord; none of their descendants, even in the tenth generation, shall ever be admitted into the congregation of the Lord.” 

------------------------------------------------------



Hagar and Ishmael are banished:  

In the Parshah, 21:10,  at the behest of Sarah, Abraham sends Hagar and Ishmael away”

וַתֹּ֨אמֶר֙ לְאַבְרָהָ֔ם גָּרֵ֛שׁ הָֽאָמָ֥ה הַזֹּ֖את וְאֶת־בְּנָ֑הּ כִּ֣י לֹ֤א יִירַשׁ֙ בֶּן־הָֽאָמָ֣ה הַזֹּ֔את עִם־בְּנִ֖י עִם־יִצְחָֽק

“And Sarah said to Abraham, Drive out this handmaid and her son, for the son of this handmaid shall not inherit with my son, with Isaac."

This is tantamount to divorcing Hagar and disinheriting Ishmael who would have normally not only shared with Isaac, but perhaps would have taken a double share.

Question arise as to why Sarah did not want Ishmael to remain in her home?

And why should Ismael not share the inheritance with Isaac?

Are there racial, religious or ethnic  implications for Jews in Israel today?

Rabbi Riskin addresses these questions, firstly looking at why Sarah was so upset with Ishmael.  At 21:9 -

  וַתֵּרֶא שָׂרָה אֶת-בֶּן-הָגָר הַמִּצְרִית, אֲשֶׁר-יָלְדָה לְאַבְרָהָםמְצַחֵק

“And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, whom she had borne unto Abraham, making sport.”

Rabbi Riskin sees מְצַחֵק as not just “amusing himself”, but probably Isaac being sodomized by Ishmael, the older brother overpowering the weaker brother.

And in the previous Parshah at 16:12 Rabbi Riskin translates – “…  יָדוֹ בַכֹּל, וְיַד כֹּל בּו…”

“…his hand grasps for everything…”

וְהוּא יִהְיֶה, פֶּרֶא אָדָם--יָדוֹ בַכֹּל, וְיַד כֹּל בּוֹ; וְעַל-פְּנֵי כָל-אֶחָיו, יִשְׁכֹּן.

 And he shall be a wild ass of a man: his hand shall be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the face of all his brethren.' 

Rabbi Riskin interprets this verse differently: “his hand is in everything and a hand in all.”

Ishmael is not a person who shares.  And given an opportunity he will overpower his brother.  He will take it all.  Ishmael is a person who can not be tamed.

Since 1947 we have always been willing to share, but Ishmael has always wanted it all.  If Rabbi Kahane had his way, Ishmael and his Egyptian mother will have been banished, sent away. 

----------------------------------------------

Hashem orders Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac:

Abraham came to Canaan when he was 75 years old.  He is now 137 years old when Hashem orders him to sacrifice Isaac.

For more than 60 years he has been gathering followers and bringing the concept of monotheism to the people of Canaan.  Isaac has been destined to carry on this work.

What is to be gained by testing Abraham’s loyalty so late in the game?  Perhaps, it is Isaac and not Abraham who is being tested.

---------------------------------------------

Just prior to the beginning of the Binding of Isaac and after the incident at Beersheba, at 21:34 – “And Abraham lived in the land of the Philistines many days”.

Then at 22:2 Abraham is commanded to go to the Land of Moriah and on a mountain that God will show him he is to offer up Isaac as a sacrifice.  Notice that God tempers His command by saying, "please" , נָ֠א.

וַיֹּ֡אמֶר קַח־נָ֠א אֶת־בִּנְךָ֨ אֶת־יְחִֽידְךָ֤ אֲשֶׁר־אָהַ֨בְתָּ֙

"And He said, "Please take your son, your only one, whom you love"

A question is raised as to just where is the Land of Moriah?  All we know is that the party starts out by donkey, from the land of the Philistines and on the 3rd day they see the place at a distance (22:4).   

My guess is that they started out from the coast plain, followed a corridor through the foothills, going eastward until they reached the Judean Mountains.  A donkey can average 3.5 miles per hour, so by the 3rd day could have gone more than a 100 miles.  The mountain in the Land of Moriah could have been the Temple Mount as per 2 Chronicles 3:1 or not.

I would speculate that Moriah, מוֹרִיָּה means “God instructs” and could be the Temple Mount.

-------------------------------------



The Akedah As Interpreted In The Muslim World

In Chapter 22 we have the Akedah, the Binding of Isaac. These passages are central to our belief system; we read them every morning.

However, there are approximately two billion Muslims in the world who hold differently. The vast majority of the Muslim world distort the Chumash and hold that it was Ishmael and not Isaac who was to be sacrificed.

Muslims erroneously believe that the episode begins prior to the birth of Isaac: Abraham tells Ishmael that he has had a vision regarding the sacrifice. Ishmael agrees to be sacrificed. No binding is necessary. As one of the rewards for his righteousness, Abraham is told that he will have another son, Isaac. Go figure.

 יִשְׁמָעֵאל means :God listened.

Whether you are a Jew or a Muslim or are a Christian it seems that a very important son is called upon to be sacrificed.

--------------------------------------------According to Rav Kook, A careful reading of the Torah’s account clearly indicates that Lot did not deserve to be saved on his own merits alone.

At 19:29:

 וַיְהִי, בְּשַׁחֵת אֱלֹהִים אֶת-עָרֵי הַכִּכָּר, וַיִּזְכֹּר אֱלֹהִים, אֶת-אַבְרָהָם; וַיְשַׁלַּח אֶת-לוֹט, מִתּוֹךְ הַהֲפֵכָה, בַּהֲפֹךְ אֶת-הֶעָרִים, אֲשֶׁר-יָשַׁב בָּהֵן לוֹט

“And it came to pass, when Hashem destroyed the cities of the Plain, that Hashem remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the overthrow, when He overthrew the cities in which Lot dwelt.”

While it is true that Lot rejected the cruel nature of the people of Sodom, that was not enough. Unlike his uncle Abraham, Lot presented no alternative vision, and did not properly contest the Sodomite ideology of cruelty.

Likewise for Jews it is not enough to reject ideologies that contradict the Torah’s ethical ideals.  It is insufficient to only engage in negative criticism. Jews must present a positive outlook, based on a vision of chessed as did the Patriarch Abraham.

(adapted from “Gold from the Land of Israel” by Chanan Morrison 

, pp. 46-48. Adapted from Ein Eyah vol. II, p. 250)